Resolved Question: Does anyone else not condemn NBA players for their mistakes?
Example, LeBron's latest escapades. Walking straight out of the arena after losing to the Magic and taking down the video of getting dunked on. Stupid moves, sure yeah. I applaud them though and forgive him for it, they show that he's human enough to make childish mistakes being a young person of course who's been been stroked thoroughly by the media.
Another example, the infamous Kobe rape case. First off, he didnt rape that girl lol, so many reasons would explain how improbable that is. But once again, it just shows that he's human enough to be away on the road and just want some nookie enough to commit adultery. A common mistake that a naturally flawed man makes all the time, back then I was a Kobe fan and I wasn't even mad at him, it showed that he was human just like everyone else and makes mistakes like everyone else does.
Basically, I believe people in the modern day expect too much out of largely advertised sports figures. Almost as they look up to their gods, they expect famous athletes to maintain a perfect, brilliant image for their entire careers and when they make those mistakes be it large or small, wish for them to condemned to the harshest extent that is given to them. The same people that want the athletes to raise their children and the same people that want them to set the standard for how society has to present themselves.
On another note though: I understand its important to be a presentable and appropriate person to the viewing world, I just highly disagree with the level of negativity and scrutiny that's dealt to the athletes that slip up as understandably as every other human being like them does.
moreResolved Question: Is this a good argumentative speech?
I wrote this in about 7 hours and I need to know if this is a good speech or if there is anything I should change or fix. The Subject is Censorship, and I am arguing against censorship. So Please give me your honest opinion. (Sorry for my messy grammer/spelling it's 2:39.)
Censorship effects us all, be it through race, religion, government party or income. Everyone in this room will be effected by censorship one way or another.
There are so many types of censorship: Moral, Military, Religious, Political, Corporate and Creative just to name a few.
Corporate Censorship is when media outlets intervene to stop the publishing of information that may depict their business or business associates in an adverse light. Privately owned corporations that report news also can refuse to share information that may cause loss of advertiser revenue or shareholder value which negative publicity may bring.
The Telecommunications Act is a law that Canadian telecommunications common carriers like Telus, Bell Canada and Verizon are regulated. The Telecommunications act at the time was not favored by the media. Records show that there were only 12 major news stories about the Telecommunications act and a total of 19.5 minutes of air time accumulated over those stories.
Much of the coverage of the new act was centered around the television content ratings and the V-chip while the considerable changes to the ownership rules of the media were almost completely ignored. Only bits and pieces of the opinions that the Critics of the legislations had were shown on air, because the legislations directly profited the media.
Newspapers can actually refuse to run commentary they don’t agree with as well. Black Press owns over 95 newspapers in the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta and other places outside of Canada. If the owner of these newspapers disagreed with new laws that were passed that could change lives, they could not print it. That is complete corporate censorship.
Religious Censorship has been an issue that has been occurring as far back as you can flip any text book. Far back in ancient times Sorcery books worth 50,000 silver were burnt by Paul’s converts at Ephesus. They have tried to completely eliminate an entire religion all together with the Holocaust! The Da Vinci Code was attacked by various religious groups, saying that Dan Brown was a Satanist and was going to hell. The movie was even banned in Samoa.
Everyone knows who Harry Potter is, the FICTIONAL orphan boy that learns he is a wizard and goes to a school for wizards. Religious groups want to ban these books from being sold, and these movies from being seen. Some Catholic followers believe that Harry Potter glamorizes Wicca, a religion involving the thought that magic can be created by “Manipulating through the form of Witchcraft or Sorcery”, but at no time is the religion advertised during the books nor movies.
If this is not evidence that censorship is occurring more than anyone would have thought, take a look at China.
Though blocks to certain websites may not apply to different cities, and they have been lifted for certain occasions, they are still BLOCKING websites. Their most recent major website was access to The New York Times which was blocked on December 20, 2008. Most foreign websites are still available for mainland China, but a few websites such as the Chinese-language service of BBC continue to be blocked and unblocked. Regardless of the small number of blocked sites, the mere fact that the government is starting to block off sites that have no reason to disappear is enough to raise suspicion.
The Golden Shield project ( Also referred too as The Great Firewall Of China ) was created and is owned by the Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China. It was created in 1998 and was actually used In the beginning of 2003.
The Golden Shield Project’s job is to block Content on the internet. It does this by stopping IP addresses from being routed through and is made up of standard firewalls and proxy servers at the Internet gateways. The system also selectively engages in DNS poisoning when particular sites are requested. The government does not appear to be methodically examining Internet content, because it is technically impractical.
The Censored Content includes but is not limited too:
*Websites that are about or are related to the Falun Gong spiritual
practice, which is not only internet censorship but religious as well.
*News Sources that cover topics such as: Police Brutality, Freedom of Speech or Democracy
*The Chinese Wikipedia which has been recently unblocked
*Any major Newspaper and television media that contain information on the Taiwanese Independence.
*Sites that are linked with the Dalai Lama and his involvement with the International Tibet Independence Movement
If you think that China’s internet problems could never get to Canada, Think again. The inter
moreResolved Question: Is the Samsung R505 laptop advertised on www.argos.co.uk any good for gaming?
Will I be able to play most games on it (may be not at the highest settings)? Also i am not sure in processors is this processor any good for applications like photoshop and the likes? I am also considering the dell studio 15, have you got any suggestions? please take in mind that my budget is under £510. Any answer would be greatly appreciated thanks in advance.
AMD Turion RM-72 processor.
2.1GHz processor speed.
1MB cache.
3GB DDR2 RAM.
15.4in screen size.
Resolution 1280 x 800 pixels.
Widescreen.
250Gb SATA hard drive.
Multi-format dual layer optical drive.
24x CD-ROM read speed.
16x CD-RW write speed.
8x DVD-ROM read speed.
4x DVD-RW write speed.
Dedicated ATI HD 3470 graphics.
256MB graphics memory.
3-in-1 media card reader - compatible with SD, MMC SDHC cards.
3 USB ports.
1 Ethernet port.
HDMI output.
RealTek ACL262-GR sound card.
1.3Mp webcam.
802.11a/b/g wireless enabled.
Microsoft Vista Premium operating system installed.
Software included: Play Camera, Easy Network Manager, Easy Battery Manager, Samsung Update, Magic Doctor, Easy Display Manager, Adobe Acrobat Reader, Microsoft Office 60 Day Trial.
Up to 3 hours battery life.
Size (H)31.8, (W)35.8, (D)26.5cm.
Weight 2.7kg.
moreResolved Question: Power of mind vs. Power of Commercials.?
I think if you made a commercial that sold korans as magic books that guaranteed to improve your jump shot and send you to heaven when you die, people would beleive it.
Today, in Iraq I had picked up lunch for a local national that was doing work for us. He was a diabetic so I made his lunch special avoiding sugars, lots of breads, and giving him caffeine free diet soda. After his meal I saw him grab a Gatorade from the cooler to drink.
That's when I got into an argument with the other American escourts about the power of American media vs. the true value of Gatorade. I argued that it was not good for him or us but we all think it is because of commercials. They disagreed beleiveing it hydrated you with electrolytes.
Even after explaining why this was false they still thought it was good for the guy.
Every living cell has a sodium potassium (electrolytes) ion exchange pump which regulates the water balance inside and outside cells. Water is attracted to particles (electrolytes) and sodium has a different charge than potassium, so as sodium and potassium will naturally balance out due to polarity water will follow and homeostasis occurs. (Hydration - given they have water.)
Thus you do not need gatorade for electrolytes. In fact gatorade has too much "electrolytes" and has a higher osmolar pull thus reducing the amount of water that goes into your body. Not to mention the sugar in it - put in it only to make it sell better. Sugar is a diuretic. (It makes you pee thus making you less hydrated.)
Plus, sweat is hypotonic. Contains less electrolytes than your blood has. Fluid loss is more of a problem usually than electroylte loss in hot days, especially for people who eat regular meals.
The drink was used on Florida Gators and was attributed to their win, but that was a different formula. Once there became a demand for it they pumped it full of sugar and mass marketed it as a sports drink.
Even after explaining all this, the other American soldiers still thought gatorade was good not only for them, but for the diabetic.
So, back to my question. Being that gatorade, like the supposid health benifits of cigarettes of yore, is unhealthy but beleived to be so because of advertising - how able are our minds to resist what society says around us even despite rational clearly laid out arguments against the statements the t.v. (society) holds as true?
moreResolved Question: Power of our minds vs. Power of Commercials?
I think if you made a commercial that sold korans as magic books that guaranteed to improve your jump shot and send you to heaven when you die, people would beleive it.
Today, in Iraq I had picked up lunch for a local national that was doing work for us. He was a diabetic so I made his lunch special avoiding sugars, lots of breads, and giving him caffeine free diet soda. After his meal I saw him grab a Gatorade from the cooler to drink.
That's when I got into an argument with the other American escourts about the power of American media vs. the true value of Gatorade. I argued that it was not good for him or us but we all think it is because of commercials. They disagreed beleiveing it hydrated you with electrolytes.
Even after explaining why this was false they still thought it was good for the guy.
Every living cell has a sodium potassium (electrolytes) ion exchange pump which regulates the water balance inside and outside cells. Water is attracted to particles (electrolytes) and sodium has a different charge than potassium, so as sodium and potassium will naturally balance out due to polarity water will follow and homeostasis occurs. (Hydration - given they have water.)
Thus you do not need gatorade for electrolytes. In fact gatorade has too much "electrolytes" and has a higher osmolar pull thus reducing the amount of water that goes into your body. Not to mention the sugar in it - put in it only to make it sell better. Sugar is a diuretic. (It makes you pee thus making you less hydrated.)
Plus, sweat is hypotonic. Contains less electrolytes than your blood has. Fluid loss is more of a problem usually than electroylte loss in hot days, especially for people who eat regular meals.
The drink was used on Florida Gators and was attributed to their win, but that was a different formula. Once there became a demand for it they pumped it full of sugar and mass marketed it as a sports drink.
Even after explaining all this, the other American soldiers still thought gatorade was good not only for them, but for the diabetic.
So, back to my question. Being that gatorade, like the supposid health benifits of cigarettes of yore, is unhealthy but beleived to be so because of advertising - how able are our minds to resist what society says around us even despite rational clearly laid out arguments against the statements the t.v. (society) holds as true?
moreResolved Question: Power of our minds vs. Power of Commercials?
I think if you made a commercial that sold korans as magic books that guaranteed to improve your jump shot and send you to heaven when you die, people would beleive it.
Today, in Iraq I had picked up lunch for a local national that was doing work for us. He was a diabetic so I made his lunch special avoiding sugars, lots of breads, and giving him caffeine free diet soda. After his meal I saw him grab a Gatorade from the cooler to drink.
That's when I got into an argument with the other American escourts about the power of American media vs. the true value of Gatorade. I argued that it was not good for him or us but we all think it is because of commercials. They disagreed beleiveing it hydrated you with electrolytes.
Even after explaining why this was false they still thought it was good for the guy.
Every living cell has a sodium potassium (electrolytes) ion exchange pump which regulates the water balance inside and outside cells. Water is attracted to particles (electrolytes) and sodium has a different charge than potassium, so as sodium and potassium will naturally balance out due to polarity water will follow and homeostasis occurs. (Hydration - given they have water.)
Thus you do not need gatorade for electrolytes. In fact gatorade has too much "electrolytes" and has a higher osmolar pull thus reducing the amount of water that goes into your body. Not to mention the sugar in it - put in it only to make it sell better. Sugar is a diuretic. (It makes you pee thus making you less hydrated.)
Plus, sweat is hypotonic. Contains less electrolytes than your blood has. Fluid loss is more of a problem usually than electroylte loss in hot days, especially for people who eat regular meals.
The drink was used on Florida Gators and was attributed to their win, but that was a different formula. Once there became a demand for it they pumped it full of sugar and mass marketed it as a sports drink.
Even after explaining all this, the other American soldiers still thought gatorade was good not only for them, but for the diabetic.
So, back to my question. Being that gatorade, like the supposid health benifits of cigarettes of yore, is unhealthy but beleived to be so because of advertising - how able are our minds to resist what society says around us even despite rational clearly laid out arguments against the statements the t.v. (society) holds as true?
This question relates to our election processes, government spin, and public health.
moreResolved Question: What can i now do on Runescape?
I'm level 67 with 353K i just completed the achievement dairy beginner, easy and medium before. And i completed my last non-member quest Witch's Potion. What can i do and what skill to train my skills are as followed. And don't recommend member skills because I'm a non-member. (Wish i was a Member).
Attack: 55 Hit points: 57 Mining: 53
Strengh: 57 Agility: 10 Smithing: 43
Defence: 52 Herbolvire: 10 Fishing: 63
Range: 50 Crafting: 48 Cooking: 61
Prayer: 33 Thieving: 28 Fire making: 54
Magic: 51 Fletching: 6 Woodcutting: 60
Rune crafting: 30 Slayer: 18 Farming: 15
Construction: 25 Hunter: 1 Summoning: 1
What skill can i train and what can i train on. Right now i kill Hill Giants for there big bones but they only give me 15exp prayer.
What can i kill im a non-member.
Thanks best answer 10 points
Oh and no advertising or say runescapes crap or you still play runescape because i do otherwise i wouldn't ask this question. Or my annoying one everyone says get a life. don't say that.
moreResolved Question: Was I sleeping for 6 years? When did the homeless go high-tech?
The signs of the past used to made of used cardboard and the lettered in crayon or magic marker. Where do they now obtain the costly advertising media to beg for food and money?
Am I missing sumting?
http://www.worth1000.com/entries/220000/220059EjLI_w.jpg
Spelling Error Poll: Overlook or Email correction to the mistake maker?Sorry folks. The link worked when I previewed the question before posting. If you want to see, copy and paste to to a browser window.
http://www.worth1000.com/entries/220000/220059EjLI_w.jpg
moreResolved Question: In the matter of black magic, witchcraft, voodoo and the many other names magiekry and sorcery?
In an age of intelligence, reason, virtue, diplomacy, courtesy, what need or requirement is there for black magic wielding so called witches. The local media boasts of Nigerian and African practitioners in the black magic arts advertising their services in the back pages of their rags.
What use is witchcraft in a civilized society…?T : I do not see any weakness in my argument, please elaborate, be concise?Savages: Foreigners are regarded generally all over the world as dumb, simply because of the language barrier.
You will find the west requires and employs more policing, government and laws to contain its people than most other nations, rendering the term savage as relative in the context used, Tahuti.
more